Talk:List of films with high frame rates
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Shorts and Rides?
editSeveral of the first films are shorts or a ride. Should the list only have feature films or should columns be added for type or running time? I think the list is short enough to support having all and there is room for narrow columns. This can show some of the history of development. StrayBolt (talk) 23:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- I support the idea of including them all and adding a column for type. Secundus Zephyrus (talk) 23:48, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Animal Farm
editThe Andy Serkis adaptation of Animal Farm was originally announced in 2012 and was going to be released by Warner Bros in 48fps HFR. After languishing for a long time with no production, the project was bought by Netflix in 2018, and since then there has been no word about HFR plans. If Netflix does it as an HFR production they would likely choose to use 60fps rather than 48 because their primary audience is in-home streaming, and there is currently no way to deliver 48fps content to the home.[1] Mdulcey (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Giardina, Carolyn (1 August 2018). "Andy Serkis to Direct 'Animal Farm' Adaptation for Netflix". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 24 June 2019.
Why?
editAre there really only 15 films that have higher than a 48 fps? I feel like 60fps has been the standard for years so this article in unnecessary. 69.29.87.224 (talk) 23:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
- No, there are only 2 (two) films with 60 fps on Blu-ray. So you are wrong. 91.78.221.238 (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Avatar and Titanic are interpolations
editThe intro to the article specifies the list shall only contain films natively shot at high frame rates but then includes Titanic and Avatar which are conversions, not originally shot in high frame rates. I'd remove them myself but someone's put in a lot of effort to add them and they seem to have been left up. Should we instead change the intro and let in other post-conversions? In my opinion the better option is remove Titanic and Avatar. mmj (talk) 00:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
- This is an inconsistency, but the distinction seems arbitrary. All films include post-processed or generated sequences. Rather than exclude films, the page should make the distinction clear. It could be expanded into sections, or the table improved to indicate these differences. That or the title should be changed to a more specific one. Currently this wiki page reads more like a personal blog entry than a straight list of high frame rate films. GeiwTeol 10:03, 7 January 2023 (UTC)