Talk:List of companies of Finland

There's Nokia, UPM-Kymmene and Nordea. Then there's Akado Oy (there's no "Oy" typed for other incorporated companies), which has a C/O address, has become VAT liable a year ago and is totally unknown in comparison to the rest of the companies in the article (come on, ask anyone). Is this firm really worth mentioning here?

Looks like a web page shop, there are lots and lots of them. Out it goes. Weregerbil 14:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

And is also listed in a very distorted alphabetical order. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 16:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Stonesoft

We should remove Stonesoft, because it's today only part of Forcepoint.  TheWiki122 (talk) 17:37, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of companies of Finland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101014010931/http://e24.no/makro-og-politikk/article3803493.ece to http://e24.no/makro-og-politikk/article3803493.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Ahlstrom

Should Ahlstrom still be on the list after what happened with Munksjö? NearCry (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Always fuzzy. I've included notable subsidiaries on these lists as long as there is a separate article for the subsidiary (like Vodafone Hungary) and they maintain the brand. Is the "company" still around?

If there's a full merger-acquisition, the Ahlstrom name is gone, and they just run it as a sub, then I'd probably mark the company as defunct and keep it on the list. If there's a full merger-acquisition,the Ahlstrom brand is retained, and they keep a presence in Finland with a local "headquarters", then I'd probably keep it on the list as a "notable subsidiary".

My main question is always, "is there an independent article about an entity, and does that entity have a headquarters (regional or not) in the country"? Kuru (talk) 11:53, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

I really don't have enough info on the topic. Maybe some Finn might have a look. Also I went through the list and there seemed to be alot of similar cases. NearCry (talk) 12:04, 19 April 2018 (UTC)