Ratings for episode "Mac's Back" edit

Since TV Media Insights restructured their site and old links are dead, those references need to be archived. The problem is, for "Mac's Back", there is a note saying it's in the comments section. Archive.org was not able to archive that since it uses Disqus which loads using JavaScript. I checked Archive.is (which we wouldn't be able to use anyway, thanks to some people, which I still find ridiculous). It has the comments section but no mention of Kirby Buckets, because it was archived too early. So we have no reliable way of verifying that information now unless we can find another source. That doesn't necessarily mean we have to remove it completely, I guess it can be assumed that it has been verified by the editor who added it at the time. nyuszika7h (talk) 15:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

For "Kick the Buckets", I found it on Archive.is, but as I said it cannot be used on enwiki (see Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC), and I haven't yet found a way to get another site to archive it (I tried WebCite, but the resulting link is a 404). This is not the place to discuss it and it seems pointless to start another discussion as it probably wouldn't change the status quo, but this is a great example of how the people who have voted to ban its use are actively harming the encyclopedia. nyuszika7h (talk) 15:11, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, I guess we can use Memento [1] as suggested at Wikipedia:Using archive.is. – nyuszika7h (talk) 15:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on List of Kirby Buckets episodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Viewership data edit

IJBall, Geraldo Perez, MPFitz1968, Nyuszika7H

Due to the nature of the viewership data being so hard to obtain and keep—the viewers link to the comment I just added for S2 E21 I'm sure will become invalid soon—especially season two, I'm considering just removing the viewers column altogether from the article. It would be nice if Showbuzz Daily would show everything, or, at the very least, up it to the top 200 or 250. If one of the other reliable sources, such as Zap2it's TV by the Numbers section, is more reliable for shows that have generally lower viewers, we could use one of them.

I'm open to ideas. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:21, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

For season #2, I'd still leave it in – it looks like there's enough data there to populate about half of the (viewership) cells. However, at the main Kirby Buckets article, there is not enough data from these to do "season average viewership" values – luckily, it looks like nobody has really attempted that there. --IJBall (contribstalk) 03:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
With archive.is now removed from the blacklist, I should be able to get the info / fix the reference for some of them, though others are simply not available as on some days Showbuzz Daily seems to simply decide not to publish the full top 50/100/150/etc. (or even if they do it may fall outside that range). nyuszika7h (talk) 07:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Oh, it looks like I haven't even fixed the TV Media Insights links here yet... nyuszika7h (talk) 07:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Repeated addition of number of episodes and end date for season two edit

It's pretty clear season two is over; however, we cannot put an end date or the number of episodes for that season until season three episodes are announced as that is WP:OR. If there is a source claiming the end of season two and its number of episodes, we can use that; however, no such source exists, so wait until season three episodes are announced. Any continued additions in the future will be reverted on the spot without hesitation. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply