Talk:List of Bradford City A.F.C. players (1–49 league appearances)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Niceguyedc in topic Requested move 5 February 2016

Too many rows to be sortable

edit

This table is far too big to have fields sortable by Javascript - I'm not entirely sure of the best solution around this, but in any case, the table is too big. Adamjhepton (talk) 09:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Adam, it could just be your browser - it sorts for me perfectly. Cheers, GiantSnowman 08:54, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm using Firefox 3.5 (on Windows), but sorting for me brings a "halt execution" dialog on any long table. FF3.5 is one of the quickest browsers out there for Javascript execution. From looking around, this issue has been brought up on other pages with long tables on them, although for users with much less optimised browsers. Adamjhepton (talk) 09:02, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I use IE at home and Firefox at work (where I currently am), and no problems for me on either...very odd. GiantSnowman 09:25, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 5 February 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 12:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply



List of Bradford City A.F.C. players with fewer than 50 league appearancesList of Bradford City A.F.C. players (1–49 league appearances) – More specific title that explicitly qualfies the rationale for inclusion into the list. Follows the format used by featured lists, including List of Birmingham City F.C. players (1–24 appearances) and List of York City F.C. players (1–24 appearances). Mattythewhite (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.