Talk:Lille Langebro
(Redirected from Talk:Lille langebro)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by TSventon in topic Capitalisation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lille Langebro article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
 | A fact from Lille Langebro appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Lille langebro looks like a twisted ribbon when it is lit up after dark? Source: Concealed lighting in the handrails illuminates both deck and wings; at night the bridge appears as a twisting ribbon of light between abutments.
- ALT1: ... that Lille langebro means "little long bridge" in Danish? Source: Lille Langebro means "little" Langebro, which means long bridge
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Elfrida von Nardroff
- Comment: Unsure about the image license so I left it out. Started January 10th, 1583 characters.
Created by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 19:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC).
Bruxton, the article is newly created, well written, long enough, neutral, with no BLP problems, contains appropriate citations, does not contain overly close paraphrasing. A QPQ has been done and looks fine, albeit with a bit of help from yourself. I have added a mention of Langebro to the text. Hooks also look OK, I prefer the first one. Small queries: I checked the references for the infobox and the lighting contractors seem to come from architecture.com rather than the references given; I think the inauguration date is implied rather than stated by architectsjournal.co.uk; should the owner be Municipality of Copenhagen rather than Realdania as it has apparently been handed over? The da article contains a few extra details. TSventon (talk) 22:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- @TSventon: Thanks so much for the review and suggestions. You are right Realdania commissioned and then ceded it to the municipality. I made the changes you suggested: regarding inauguration I remember seeing it, but it is paywalled now, so I have hidden it. Bruxton (talk) 23:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Bruxton: I have made some small changes to the infobox, hopefully they are self explanatory. TSventon (talk) 10:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This is my second review, the article has a nice infobox image, could somebody advise if freedom of panorama in Denmark would allow it to be used? Does cc-by-sa-2.0 need any further disclosure? TSventon (talk) 10:45, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Capitalisation edit
Bruxton, I think the article needs to be moved to Lille Langebro, in line with the sources and the da Wikipedia article. I am not sure why I didn't notice it before. TSventon (talk) 12:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)