Talk:Library of Celsus

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Artever in topic Wiki Education assignment: Roman Art

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mar.nw.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

The article is very descriptive in terms of its physical features and the contents within the library. A few things to note: the "l" in library of Celsus at the beginning of the article is not capitalized. Also adding headings will make the article appear more organized and flow smoother. Though the physical description is great and I have no recommendations for improvement upon it, it dominates the entire article. Perhaps organizing the historical significance into one main paragraph separate from the physical description would be more clear. Also separating the distinctive parts of the physical descriptions into subheadings would help, such as amount and cost of books, architecture, etc. You might also want to explain how exactly the Greeks influenced Roman architecture using examples within the article. Great pictures and very well-written. Good use of the "See Also" section as well. -Kevin Carey

great use of description and details. one thing you could expand upon is the actual scrolls housed in the library. what was on them? how were they organized, by author, by subject? also, what types of people were allowed into the library? how did they check things out, or were the scrolls not allowed to leave the library? this all might be unnecesarily specific, if you cannot answer these questions, don't sweat it. good work. -- Mark Nilsson

The article is very well written and is very informative. The organization is very good and makes the article easy to follow, but I do agree that section headings would be helpful as a reference to the reader and make it even smoother. Beyond that, I would agree with Mark that you might want to elaborate a bit more on the contents of the library, and also who its patrons might have been. One additional thing might be to give some information as to its orientation in Ephesus. -Peter Moore

Why is it in ruins? edit

Well, that's my question; why is it in ruins?, was it war? time? a natural catastrophe? the communists? Or perhaps the good-old-ever-vandalizing christians? Whatever the answer is it is important to include it in this article, I don't ask it just because I don't have anything to do.Alejandro Alatorre Vargaslugo (talk) 02:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fate of the scrolls? edit

The article omits to mention what happened to the 12,000 scrolls and thereby implies that the scrolls are still there.--Auric (talk) 13:08, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Ephesus Celsus Library Façade .jpg to appear as POTD soon edit

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Ephesus Celsus Library Façade .jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 20, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-09-20. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

The Library of Celsus is an ancient Roman building in Ephesus, Anatolia, now part of Selçuk, Turkey. It was completed in 135 AD and intended both to honour Senator Tiberius Julius Celsus Polemaeanus and store his remains.Photo: Benh Lieu Song

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Library of Celsus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Library of Celsus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Library of Celsus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Roman Art edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2022 and 19 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Babymel418 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Danielhur01, Wmalvey.

— Assignment last updated by Artever (talk) 22:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)Reply