Talk:Liber de Coquina

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mscuthbert in topic Citation needed on origins

Digital versions edit

I removed the words "for use for scholarly, private and non-profit purposes" as there is no basis for this restriction under US law. Published in France or Italy in the 14th C., the work is PD-100 (PD worldwide) as the author of the Latin text has been dead for between 5 and 7 hundred years. The transcription at http://www.uni-giessen.de adds no creative content to the original.--Doug.(talk contribs) 19:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed on origins edit

I couldn't quickly find a citation for the origins of the two parts, but reading them it seems pretty obviously true, especially about the Italian origin of part 2. I suppose it's WP and everything needs a citation, but is this really something people who have looked at the text are likely to challenge? All the "In Rome they do this, but in Pisa they do that" in part 2. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply