Talk:Levulinic acid

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Formula edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion

The structural formula of the acid is wrong. It has 6 carbons! Someone should change it --Kupirijo 22:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

reported on Project Chemistry Image Request. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 22:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fixed, thank you. Fvasconcellos 00:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, it does have 5 carbons —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.1.100.110 (talk) 14:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Niche uses edit

Reference 5 does not deal with additives "used in cigarettes to increase nicotine delivery in smoke and binding of nicotine to neural receptors" and does not mention levulinic acid at all. Please give a correct reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.138.107 (talk) 09:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

   Okay, there seem to be two documents bearing the same title; one ("Report No. 03-05") is in fact a suitable reference. I will add the necessary information and a link in the reference section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.204.138.107 (talk) 12:44, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic