Talk:Lesley M. M. Blume

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Saintstephen000 in topic significant uncited notable

Untitled

edit

I think this author seems to be well on her way to notability, which arguably she's already achieved. Her book seems to be a pretty big success in its demographic (preteen girls). So I think it's reasonable to remove the deletion. what it needs is sources and stub notes. Felisse 00:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lesley M. M. Blume. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

significant uncited notable

edit

these awards need source. thanks and happy editing, Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 22:37, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply