This article was nominated for deletion on 26 September 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion
I'm unsure about the notability of this page. He would fail WP:POLITICIAN and doesn't seem to yet meet the GNG, although he may due if he receives more coverage in the months leading up to the election. Mattlore (talk) 22:23, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
It's debatable, but he is arguably a "major local political figure who has received significant press coverage". You could say he's a major figure in that he is the leader of a registered party that at the last election came close to entering parliament. And he is mentioned in many news articles. So I'd say he meets the criteria. HenryCrun15 (talk) 12:59, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
As there are currently only four sources, two of which are press releases from his party and two are just election results stats, I very much doubt he reaches the "significant press coverage" level at the moment. Mattlore (talk) 22:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
I'm fine with that if you think so. I should have gained more consensus for the move. However, I don't have a doubt that Baker will receive more coverage as the campaign for the election comes on, so I weakly oppose the move. J94702:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
The article now has seven independent sources cited (not counting party press statements and election results) which seems good enough for notability in my book Kiwichris (talk) 09:41, 5 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
.JPG)