Talk:Leblouh

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 10 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Laylaadeyahmed. Peer reviewers: Echristinem.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Why three articles from three different reporters within three days?

I have know idea what the reality is with Leblouh. If it exists, it seems tragic. But could it be a hoax? The three articles referenced in the external links were all published in the last week of February 2009, by three different reporters.

Why?

How did this idea arise among the three? How do we know the three articles aren't linked by some underlying agent who is coordinating, or encouraging, the three whether those reporters know it or not?

75.174.208.52 (talk) 17:30, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

The local reporters' names are different in each article. Could be that someone held a press conference about it. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 02:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Dead link

Footnote nr 2 is a dead link. Idunius (talk) 11:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Gavage

"Gavage" is a French word used in several meanings. It can mean both "feed" and "force-feed". You will need to select the translation that you think fits best. The word "Gavage" is bad english.Jesper7 (talk) 11:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Books

Mauritania [By] Alfred G. Gerteiny — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesper7 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

You tube

You tube is original source for the most part of the article. −

• Force feeding in Mauritania - CBC TV report September 26, 2011

−

• Africa Uncovered - Mauritania: Fat or Fiction - Part 1 11 August 2008

−

• Africa Uncovered - Mauritania: Fat or Fiction - Part 2 11 August 2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesper7 (talk • contribs) 08:41, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Content Gap: Forced Feeding

The force feeding of young girls and women is a form of violence against women that is not as talked about. There appears to me to be a content gap here, as it states that it occurs in one place but sources are cited from many different locations and cultures. There is also no information about the health effects that the practice may have or the current or past levels of impact on youth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwen.majorwilliams (talk • contribs) 21:06, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

This article is non-standard in that a large number of resources, mainly journalistic articles, are listed as external links, but it isn't clear that the information within them has been synthesised into the body of the text. That would be one place to start. Or you could go straight to more scholarly sources. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 10:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leblouh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141112220112/http://www.phmuseum.com/imigra/series/force-feeding-in-mauritania-1 to http://www.phmuseum.com/imigra/series/force-feeding-in-mauritania-1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

How many of the sources here are ones from the early 2000s?

Going through this article, it seems like a lot of the sources are ones from the early 2000s; only 14 of the 34 sources used are from after 2010, and some of those are not even from after 2015.—Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 19:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)