Cut-and-past viloation edit

The plot synopsis seems to have been taken from here: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0037865/plotsummary —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.53.197.12 (talk) 01:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Noir or Not edit

While it seems that this movie is classified as "noir" it lacks a lot of classical noir elements. True, it's told as a flashback, it has an evil woman (aka femme fatale), but that's about it. The camera work is standard; there is nothing unusual or noir-tistic [©] about it. The dialog is more-or-less soap opera. The final courtroom scene is lame. Vincent Price's questions etc. were objectionable but Ray Collins said nothing. It's hard to consider a movie that gets to the courtroom as noir, anyway. The plot should be resolved without legalities. I can see why some people call this noir, but the theme of a woman killing herself to attempt revenge from the grave has been used many times, and better than this. What this movie lacks is: noir camera angles, noir dialog, a hidden plan from the beginning (instead of the incomprehensible vagaries of a woman's mind), a motive (everyone is rich), a conspiracy, a big city, and a general feeling. 173.174.85.204 (talk) 02:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC) EricReply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply