Talk:Laurent Louis
 | A fact from Laurent Louis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 June 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Laurent Louis from fr.wikipedia. |
Irrelevant
edit"He is well known for his anti-pedophile activism."
How ? When ? Where ? On google, the only sources that support him are conspiracy websites.
Not very serious.
From the french article, this guys seems to like attention : when it's not rumors about the "pedophile conspiracy", it's the freemasons or the romani.
But did he ever do something ? Did he help to catch a criminal ? Nope. Ranting is not enough to be labelled "anti-pedophile activist". He's just a politician.
ps : now his new rant is the french intervention in Mali. He denounces the "international manipulation", the "neo-colonialism", "the lies of the war on terror"... The usual stuff.
- You're a fucking idiot.
- now the page is even talking shit about him: "Laurent Louis is well known for having tried to use alleged anti-pedophile activism in order to promote himself" ... lol? as long as it talks shit about him its no longer irrelevant? what is going on here?
- "…In order to promote himself" is what is written in the newspapers and magazines of national importance used in the references. --H2O(talk) 17:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- now the page is even talking shit about him: "Laurent Louis is well known for having tried to use alleged anti-pedophile activism in order to promote himself" ... lol? as long as it talks shit about him its no longer irrelevant? what is going on here?
- Indeed, Laurent speaks of Freemasons, the Romani and the Illuminati, but his intended target is the 0.01%, as indicated by his comments on control of the economy and govt by the Illuminati et al (as well as protecting the pedophiles). In essence he is trying to establish a nefarious historical context for the corruptions of the 0.01%. That Laurent uses the inflammatory language of Freemasons, Romani, and Illuminati for purposes of inciting the less educated members of his political base does not automatically reduce the rest of his argument to to "self promotion". In this case, I would request some consideration of the tendency, when people talk of the hegemony of the 0.01%, for them to be dismissed as conspiricists. Is there or is there not an elitist class whose interests run counter to egalitarian principles? How much cultural control is exerted by the fact that around 147 companies control the worlds economic tides -- http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-who-really-controls-global-economy/ -- or by the fact that these elites control the electoral process in the US via unlimited campaign donations and ownership of 90% of the media there? It is not a conspiracy. It is an overt economic hijacking of the State. And it's not just in the US. It's starting up full swing in Belgium, and Laurent is pointing that out, if rather flamboyantly.
- Any documents of reference in order to substantiate the above claims? Or are these merely personal thoughts with no available back-up based on reliable sources? Because there are on the contrary many sources that show that most of the Belgian consider that his usual rants are completely worthless. --Lebob (talk) 12:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
- Indeed, Laurent speaks of Freemasons, the Romani and the Illuminati, but his intended target is the 0.01%, as indicated by his comments on control of the economy and govt by the Illuminati et al (as well as protecting the pedophiles). In essence he is trying to establish a nefarious historical context for the corruptions of the 0.01%. That Laurent uses the inflammatory language of Freemasons, Romani, and Illuminati for purposes of inciting the less educated members of his political base does not automatically reduce the rest of his argument to to "self promotion". In this case, I would request some consideration of the tendency, when people talk of the hegemony of the 0.01%, for them to be dismissed as conspiricists. Is there or is there not an elitist class whose interests run counter to egalitarian principles? How much cultural control is exerted by the fact that around 147 companies control the worlds economic tides -- http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-who-really-controls-global-economy/ -- or by the fact that these elites control the electoral process in the US via unlimited campaign donations and ownership of 90% of the media there? It is not a conspiracy. It is an overt economic hijacking of the State. And it's not just in the US. It's starting up full swing in Belgium, and Laurent is pointing that out, if rather flamboyantly.
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07tnFzEDZZ8 - this is belgium parliament in original. What is he talking about? Pro or contra pedophily?
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Laurent Louis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140524025427/http://blogs.rue89.nouvelobs.com/histoires-belges/2014/01/06/qui-est-ce-depute-belge-qui-fait-la-quenelle-au-parlement-232030 to http://blogs.rue89.nouvelobs.com/histoires-belges/2014/01/06/qui-est-ce-depute-belge-qui-fait-la-quenelle-au-parlement-232030
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 18 December 2017 (UTC)