Talk:LGBT rights in Indiana

Changes

Wow, what a difference. Please fell free to make appropriate changes due to today's court decision. Bearian (talk) 21:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

I suggest making a note that Indiana birth certificates do not record birth sex, so of course the state does not require SRS to change the sex on a birth certificate because it isn't there to begin with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.184.50.45 (talk) 15:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Kokomo added to map

Kokomo needs added to the map of places where there is protection. Kokomo passed an ordinance in April 2016 protection gay and transgendered people from employment discrimination, and discrimination in general. The sources are on the page where it lists Kokomo as a city that has those. --Jacobjimmy2000 (talk) 23:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGBT rights in Indiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131212111318/http://bl-ids-website.ads.iu.edu/news/story.aspx?id=87933 to http://bl-ids-website.ads.iu.edu/news/story.aspx?id=87933

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Image indicators in tables

@Lmharding: Thanks for acknowledging your error in removing the sourced material. I understand; we all make mistakes.

What I do not really understand is adding a "cross" image to the "tick" [US: "check"] image, so including both on the 'Transgender people allowed to serve openly in the military' line in the table. As you mention "most but not all", are allowed, do you mind providing a source for that? I believe the summary tables in most US states and the federal article do not have this. If there are significant exceptions, then it would be best to discuss what they are in the appropriate section of the article.

Prior to an edit made by a blocked IP user, here. (The change made was to "no", only.) Up until that point, the table said " (Most Transgender personnel allowed to serve openly since 2021)" and it was not qualified with a "no". Please change the table back, to simpler form, and I will ask for a WP:3O, if you still think it should include "no" symbol. Thanks. AukusRuckus (talk) 03:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

George Washington

And George Washington could be a buggarist?74.82.228.21 (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)