Talk:L.E.K. Consulting

Untitled

Dear Philippe,

I am new to Wiki and am interested in this page. What is the best way to engage you in discussion on it? Jacques6383 (talk) 12:26, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

There is no reason for deletion of this article. L.E.K. Consulting is one of the largest strategy consulting firms by revenue and staff numbers and widely recognised within the business community. All other major consultancies have Wikipedia entries see Management consulting firms 82.71.38.167 (talk) 23:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

It was ddeleted in Aug 2007 because it was not natable. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L.E.K. Consulting. -- Alan Liefting-talk- 00:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I disagree, and have declined to act at this time. Based upon the information provided, I believe it to be a notable company. - Philippe | Talk 01:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The firms around it in the Vault Rankings of prestigious consulting firms mostly have more developed wiki pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psellis (talk • contribs) 14:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Removing Sections on "Recent Activities and Corporate Environment"

The section on recent activities is essentially advertisement. That said, the Queen's award is notable and I am moving it to the introduction to save it from standing alone. Secondly, the corporate environment is very much an advertisement as well. In any case, such information (on corporate environment) is not encyclopaedic except in situations where a particular firm's culture has been a subject of notable controversies. LEK teaches soft skills, so what? They have an out by six program that is popular with their employees, so what? These stuff don't belong on Wikipedia. Removing these sections paves the way for me to remove the advertisement tag.Jamesneilanderson (talk) 11:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Promotional content removed

I have removed a large chunk of promotional content, added by various editors and IPs with a probable conflict of interest. Ranking statistics, reports about accomplishments, social activities to polish a company's reputation, and similar information need independent sources to establish their encyclopedic relevance (and accuracy). Also, all other promotional or subjective claims need to be referenced with such independent sources, not the company's own PR department. GermanJoe (talk) 19:06, 20 October 2017 (UTC)