This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 8 months ago4 comments4 people in discussion
It seems the article is written from a certain perspective and I'm biased but I my eyes based stickman is the last great american hero Ravioli, Lord Of The Based (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, because being the kind of person who attacks people with a weapon because they don't like their political views is just another perfectly respectable political opinion, just like being a liberal, conservative, or socialist. Referring to nice decent people who do things like that as though they were criminal thugs is obviously unreasonable bias. (And by the way, since you ask, no, Wikipedia makes no claim to being"2bipartisan".) 79.123.77.189 (talk) 16:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
This article reads like it was written by Antifa. I watched the videos from those street fight, and he wasn't fighting innocent leftist protesters. Those leftist protesters were armed with clubs, pepper spray, and bike locks in socks. People had to go to the hospital from severe head injuries from the far left protesters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.183.68.62 (talk) 19:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia articles strive to be neutral, not "bipartisan". We do not introduce false balance where the sourcing does not support it.
The Wikipedia policy on neutral point of view requires that we represent fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. Can you please explain whether a) you feel that there are other significant views published by reliable sources that present a different viewpoint that needs to be represented in this page, or b) the article does not represent the current sources that are being used? If a), please provide links to the reliable sources that you have found, ensuring they meet the policy on reliable sourcing. If you are unsure, WP:RSP contains a long list of commonly-suggested sources along with the general consensus among the Wikipedia editing community on whether or not they are considered reliable. GorillaWarfare(talk) 17:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
