Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) --24.52.31.117 (talk) 03:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because information is true and accurate. Kurtis Conner is known enough to warrant his own Wikipedia page.

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because any any possible misinformation has been amended by either being corrected or deleted altogether. All information present within the draft is known to be true.

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because...

Well, it's not vandalism. It all looks pretty true. He is a Canadian youtuber. He did get popularized on Vine. He did tour with Drew and Danny. Source: his channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7zsxKqd5MicTf4VhS9Y74g I'm too lazy to add cites to the page. But someone should.

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) --Meby23 (talk) 14:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because in the most recent podcast of Kurtis Conner (Episode 115: I'm In Wallows Now) he does talk about his connection with the members of the alternative band, and both sides of the party have publicly verified the fact that Kurtis is a new member.

Semi-protected edit request on 11 March 2022

edit

I noticed there isn't an image showing Kurtis Conner. Could this be the image for him? thumb Soulsnutcracker (talk) 01:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! When we are talking about articles about people currently still alive I tend to be unwilling to make major changes - such as uploading an image of said person - without consensus. I would suggest opening a new section on this page inviting people to discuss and, presuming there is sufficient consensus to add it (or there is no opposition in a reasonable time period), it would then be appropriate to re-open an edit request (from my view). Alternatively, once you are autoconfirmed - which happens when you get 10 edits and your account is live for 3 days - you may boldly make the desired change yourself. Another alternative is another editor comes across the request, disagrees with my assessment, and moves forward - which is also completely fine and normal. Cheers! —Sirdog (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
  Comment: Image proposed by OP has since been deleted from Commons due to a copyright violation. —Sirdog (talk) 03:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2022

edit

I believe that in the occupation section it should say Wallows Member due to him being apart of the group. 24.177.193.156 (talk) 05:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. 💜  melecie  talk - 09:50, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply