Talk:Kristi Lee

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 216.195.89.58 in topic Kristi Lee's and Donnie Baker's Child

Bart Starr's Baby? edit

Yes, this morning during the session discussing the extortion attempt by Ruby ?, she suggested that she was the daughter of Bart Starr from 1960.

Lmcelhiney 21:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bart Starr has two children, Bart Jr. and Bret. --Kainaw (talk) 02:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

PRD for WP:BIO? edit

I do not agree with the editor's choice of placing a PROD tag on this article related to WP:BIO and have removed it. One of the sections of WP:Notability (people) deals with entertainers:

Entertainers: actors, comedians, opinion makers, and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions. Notability can be determined by:

  • Multiple features in credible magazines and newspapers
  • A large fan base, fan listing, or "cult" following
  • A credible independent biography
  • Wide name recognition
  • Commercial endorsements


Kristi Lee is a radio personality on the Bob and Tom Show heard on over 150 radio stations in the USA everyday, she has a very large base of fans and she has wide name recognition among the 1000s of listeners. She is named as a participant on most of the albums they produced (over 40).[1] She participates in the Bob and Tom Radio: The Comedy Tours which have been released on DVD.

In addition, though with some need for disambiguation, I did a Google search and obtained numerous hits. [2][3] [4][5][6]

I will edit the article to add more of the references.

Thanks for reading this.

--Lmcelhiney 20:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Adam Ritz edit

Adam Ritz is a REGISTERED SEX OFFENDER in the state of Indiana. That addition is NOT LIBELOUS. Leave page alone. http://www.theindychannel.com/news/3272020/detail.html (unsigned)

This article is not about Adam Ritz. Per WP policy and guidelines, the article should maintain NPOV and "do no harm".
Thanks for understanding. Lmcelhiney 22:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)Reply


I feel its relevant as it was her spouse & a large part of her life. Where can I appeal this too? Thanks. (unsigned)

I greatly disagree. It sticks out like a sore thumb on this otherwise short page. It's a needless call to attention to something that doesn't need to be here. If you feel it needs added, you going to go through every police report of every other person affiliated with a radio personality, and make sure they are mentioned on their respective pages? I agree it's not libelous, but it simply doesn't fit. Seeing as it was your only edit/contribution to Wikipedia, it also lacks in credibility for your reasoning. 216.136.4.136 (talk) 15:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
And we now have someone else trying to get this information in. Please stop. Provide a reliable source for her "name" or leave it out. And her ex-husband is not relevant to this article. Period. John from Idegon (talk) 06:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Theresa Ritz edit

User:John from Idegon you disagree with my source for the real name of radio personality Kristi Lee [9]. This is a legitimate source for her name. The Indianapolis Star printed this on the front page of their "CITY STATE" section (B-1) on May 6, 2004. As unfortunate as it may be that the article is about her husband mostly, who is a convicted sex offender, it's the only article to be found that gives her actual name. The article states in part "Theresa Ritz uses the name Kristi Lee when she delivers the daily news reports for the syndicated "Bob and Tom Show" on WFBQ-FM (94.7)." Furthermore, User:John from Idegon previously had a problem when I cited it without a source and told me to get a source. I obtained a source and he still reverts it to an edit of her name that has no source at all. I would welcome User:John from Idegon to find another article that cites her actual name that doesn't include anything about her husband. Further evidence that this is her name can be found in these public records [10] that are readily available.--SportsMaster (talk) 19:55, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

The following is copy and paste from the closed as premature WP:DR/N discussion.

User:John from Idegon disagrees with my source for the real name of radio personality Kristi Lee [11]. This is a legitimate source for her name. The Indianapolis Star printed this on the front page of their "CITY STATE" section (B-1) on May 6, 2004. As unfortunate as it may be that the article is about her husband mostly, who is a convicted sex offender, it's the only article to be found that gives her actual name. The article states in part "Theresa Ritz uses the name Kristi Lee when she delivers the daily news reports for the syndicated "Bob and Tom Show" on WFBQ-FM (94.7)." Furthermore, User:John from Idegon previously had a problem when I cited it without a source and told me to get a source. I obtained a source and he still reverts it to an edit of her name that has no source at all. I would welcome User:John from Idegon to find another article that cites her actual name that doesn't include anything about her husband. Further evidence that this is her name can be found in these public records[12] that are readily available.SportsMaster (talk · contribs)

Firstly, I find his claim about the reason to make these edits disingenuous. Back in November, he inserted information regarding the ex-husband sex offender, which other than a blog he has shown no proof that anyone can see is even her husband. There is already a discussion on the talkpage regarding that info; it is an obvious violation of WP:BLP1E and really does not have any bearing on the subject of the article. see this dif: [13]. Secondly the only ref I can see has no connection showing it actually is Kristi Lee. The others offered was something behind a paywall on the Bob and Tom website, and the article he mentions that by the way is also paywalled. The only ref that can be seen is of questionable reliability and it doesn't actually connect the Kirsti Lee persona to any real name. In short, when we have a reference that is reliable to show that is her name, I would really have no problem with a change. But if the purpose of his edit is to "correct" her real name, i would ask why the reference he added seems to support the "Rose" name? John from Idegon (talk) 20:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
I would also ask that you remember that editing wikipedia is a passtime for all. I will respond when I have both time and internet access. I do not have the time or the inclination to worry about dealing with this in a hurry. And please stop inserting your preferred version. The edit model is that when you are reverted you talk about it; not you go to your preferred version and then talk about it. It is obvious that we are not going to agree; I will ask for WP:3O. John from Idegon (talk) 20:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
There are references for books which are not readily available online, yet you have a problem with a newspaper version because you don't want to pay the money, like I did, to see the article. I'm sure if you would call the Indianapolis library they would be more than happy to e-mail you a copy of the article I specified.--SportsMaster (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have not posted anything that isn't factually backed up. Here is the connection to Adam Ritz you claimed there was no known connection. It states "Ritz's wife, radio personality Kristi Lee, did not comment while leaving court, Pursley reported." [14] Furthermore the other reference I added, that is public record lists all the known alias names of someone. It doesn't necessarily list the current one as the first name.--SportsMaster (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Like I said, I doubt we are going to agree. The purpose of your edits still seem to be some vendetta to connect her to him. The unreliable source reference that you did attach that was actually verifiable to anyone did not support the information you were referencing. And you still have not reverted this back to before this dispute started, which is the right thing to do. I am more than happy to work with an editor that wants to try to find a reasonable comprmise to reach a consensus, but all you have done is edit in bad faith, misrepresenting my words and ignoring the editing model.show some good faith. I never claimed there was no known connection between ms. lee and the guy. I claimed rightfully that you had not shown one, and even if you did, you hadn't shown that ms. lee is connected to the Ritzs name. You still haven't. She could be married to you or I and her last name could be Snicklegruber. This is the 2010s, not the 1940s. John from Idegon (talk) 03:47, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
I am open to a compromise. What do you have in mind? I honestly don't have a vendetta. I would rather have a source article that doesn't include her husband. I unfortunately can't find one at all. I have searched quite a bit for one. Is your problem the fact that her name is cited on here, or the fact that the article used to cite the name involves her husband as well? --SportsMaster (talk) 04:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nerds Billygilman39 (talk) 22:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kristi Lee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 8 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Kristi Lee's and Donnie Baker's Child edit

We need some information about what will be of their child. They shared joint custody but now that Donnie has past, I think something needs to be said about the future. It is actually state law that we know. 216.195.89.58 (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2023 (UTC)Reply