Talk:Korean Brazilians

Merger proposal

It was suggested that this article be merged with Immigration to Brazil, but the merger tag was removed without a word of discussion. This merger may be the best way to make sure that the information in this article is findable.--Wloveral (talk) 02:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Korean-Brasilian Population Statistic

The current Korean-Brasilian population statistic on the wiki page, in my opinion, doesn't seem to correctly reflect the true amount of Korean-Brasilians that reside in Brasil. The 48,419 persons are current Korean nationals registered to the Korean Consulate in São Paulo. It probably doesn't reflect the number of "native-born" descendants who are Brasilian nationals --Thetaylor310 (talk) 21:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Requested move 24 June 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as proposed. Koreans in Brazil created as a redirect. Jenks24 (talk) 11:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

---

Korean Brazilian → Korean Brazilians – Per WP:PLURAL and Talk:Korean Australians. Or Koreans in Brazil to avoid confusion. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 06:00, 1 July 2015 (UTC) George Ho (talk) 11:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Regards, Sovereign/^Sentinel 11:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Which title? Original proposal or other one? George Ho (talk) 12:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Korean Brazilians. Regards, Sovereign/^Sentinel 17:03, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

• Koreans in Brazil would probably be better. "Korean Brazilians" could refer to Brazilians in Korea. —  AjaxSmack  02:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
• Koreans in Brazil is much better, the current title is ambiguous as it could refer to the opposites Brazilians in Korea and Koreans in Brazil -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 21:54, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
• Support move to "Koreans in Brazil". Khestwol (talk) 22:11, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
• Support "Korean Brazilians". Seems more common in the sources about this group according to Google Books.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Korean Brazilians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101023213104/http://www.mofat.go.kr/consul/overseascitizen/compatriotcondition/index6.jsp?TabMenu=TabMenu6 to http://www.mofat.go.kr/consul/overseascitizen/compatriotcondition/index6.jsp?TabMenu=TabMenu6
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614033819/http://www.ekoreajournal.net/archive/detail.jsp?BACKFLAG=Y&VOLUMENO=47&BOOKNUM=2&PAPERNUM=7&SEASON=Summer&YEAR=2007 to http://www.ekoreajournal.net/archive/detail.jsp?BACKFLAG=Y&VOLUMENO=47&BOOKNUM=2&PAPERNUM=7&SEASON=Summer&YEAR=2007
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://web.archive.org/web/20061002015049/http%3A//www.interedu.go.kr/edu_net/overseas/sch_formal_inform.htm?no=28&page=1&key=4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 7 May 2017 (UTC)