Talk:Koodiyattam

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Skylark95choppen in topic Classification

Comment edit

mani madhava chakiyar could be removed as it is already thereas another articleactivevoid 21:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Classification edit

Koodiyattam has its early origin in tamil area,before sanskritised it may be played extensively in tamil nadu.So classification of koodiyattam as a malayalam art alone is incorrect.It is an art that belongs to malayalam and tamil as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.140.43.10 (talk) 11:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Claims are ridiculous and Claiming art forms just based on 1000 years ago history is cheap as it is exclusive to Kerala.No art form is Based on Language as claimed like Tamil art and Malayalam art or even Telugu Art.More over it is Tamil Nationalist texture in your comment. Skylark95choppen (talk) 18:03, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF KOODIYATTAM PERFORMED IN TAMIL NADU.YOUR COMMENT SAYS "MAY".WHICH SAYS EVEN YOU ARE NOT SURE.ITS LTTE PROPAGANDA Skylark95choppen (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mistake in File edit

The first black and white image of Mani Madhava Chakyar - the middile character is using a crown not from traditional koodiyattam but from kathakali. Suggest to replace this image with more apt one. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 12:25, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Koodiyattam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply