Talk:Khalid bin Abdullah Al Saud (born 1950)


Eldest?

edit

or is it Mutaib bin Abdullah? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 03:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

He is eldest, as shown by the sourced content regarding their education.Egeymi (talk) 21:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Mutaib bin Abdullah (1st) is the oldest sun of king Abdullah bin abdulaziz, but he died at young age. and Mutaib bin Abdullah is the seccond sun named as Mutaib.--Peadara (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Khalid bin Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khalid bin Abdullah bin Abdulaziz Al Saud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Mass restoration of poorly sourced puffery

edit

I removed some incredibly poorly sourced puffery and made the article look less like a CV. The article literally said, "Khalid bin Abdullah is considered to be one of the most respected royals." My changes were undone in their entirety by the editor 'Egeymi', the same editor who added the ludicrous puffery about being "one of the most respected royals."[1] Snooganssnoogans (talk) 05:09, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

I just asked you to explain your mass changes. You may use edit summaries to clarify your edits, instead of accusing me here. --Egeymi (talk) 05:10, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
:: Here's the explanation for the big edit: It's a glorified LinkedIn profile that brazenly violates WP:NPOV and WP:RS. It bears all the hallmarks of having been either written by the subject himself or a COI account. Content that is not sourced to reliable sources and which has zero encyclopedic value should be removed. It shouldn't require elaborate explanations. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 05:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
And if you look at my edit carefully, you will see that these do not include addition of the statement like "one of the most respected royals." You should give an explanation while doing changes like that. --Egeymi (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Is this not your series of edits[2]? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 05:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
What are you trying to do? Here the topic is your deletion of the content without any explanation, not my previous edits. And please stop attacking me, Egeymi (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
You said, "if you look at my edit carefully, you will see that these do not include...". But isn't this your series of edits[3]? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 05:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

His Mother is the daughter of Mohammed Alshiekh not Abdullah Alshiekh

edit

His Mother is the daughter of Mohammed Alshiekh not Abdullah Alshiekh. Here is the source www.al-madina.com/ampArticle/179146

Her father has this Arabic Wikipedia page https://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%85%D8%AF_%D8%A8%D9%86_%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%B2_%D8%A2%D9%84_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%AE

93.169.38.36 (talk) 15:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply