Talk:Keystone Studios
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:KeystoneSennett.jpg edit
Image:KeystoneSennett.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Keystone, new and old edit
The new Keystone does not seem to be related to the old Keystone. It seems like the new one should merit a mention, at best. KConWiki (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Keystone Camera edit
Any relation to the Keystone Camera Company? --Elijah (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC).
Request by Public Storage to Add Line at the End About Current Use edit
Today Public Storage 1712 Glendale Blvd, Los Angeles operates a facility in one of the studio’s converted buildings. References: [1] PSA1972 (talk)PSA1972 — Preceding undated comment added 18:25, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for not simply adding self-promotional materials directly to the article. It would be reasonable to mention the current use of the building, but a secondary source would be good to include. Do you happen to know of any? --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 19:20, 25 September 2014 (UTC)