Talk:Ken Holland
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Olympics edit
I noticed him on the ice. Apparently he was the Canadian "Team Advisor". [1] Considering Canada won Gold, surely that is worth a mention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.105.107 (talk) 22:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Weasel Words edit
The phrase "[h]e is generally considered one of the best general managers in the NHL today" falls into the weasel words category. The phrase should be reworded with a citation or removed.Rejectwater (talk) 15:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think that entire second paragraph can be removed. It cites names that might otherwise be meaningless to those outside of Red Wings fandom or even general hockey fandom. Crimson667 (talk) 18:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Categorization edit
He is currently categorized as a Detroit Red Wings player. Wouldn't it make more sense to have him categorized under Detroit Red Wings instead, as he is far more well known as a GM than a player? Or can he be listed under both? Rejectwater (talk) 23:49, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Qualifications/Citations edit
there seems to be back and forth re form of citation & included qualifications for Holland - both from registered users and from anonymous IP addresses. The most recent (before reversion) edit included info re Holland's President's Cup. I've reverted that edit - simply b/c i don't understand why that's not an appropriate edit. If there are concerns re what's included and who citations are offered, let's discuss them. as always, it's helpful when people have accounts. GLG GLG (talk) 07:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
- i added something about the president's trophies from the cited article and someone reverted it for no reason. smh 99.231.223.73 (talk) 20:58, 15 August 2014 (UTC)