Talk:Keith Murray
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | On 17 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Keith Murray (rapper) to Keith Murray. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Untitled edit
This article sucks. It's written poorly and it doesn't make sense that the Singles centre around the UK single chart, where Murray is pretty unknown.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.244.155 (talk)
I changed 'impressive' criminal record, to 'extensive', the word impressive seems to make a POV judgement that having a long record is a good thing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.48.1.169 (talk)
Fair use rationale for Image:Enigma-album.jpg edit
Image:Enigma-album.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:It's a Beautiful Thing.jpg edit
Image:It's a Beautiful Thing.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 17 July 2021 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: both moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vaticidalprophet 04:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
– By pageviews and long-term significance, Keith Murray of Def Squad is the primary topic here. 162 etc. (talk) 20:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC) —Relisting. SkyWarrior 03:31, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:31, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support Stats show an overwhelmingly clear primary topic. Neither the artist, academic, or rugby player seem to demonstrate the discrepancy in long term significance to justify overriding the incredibly clear primary topic readers are seeking.--Yaksar (let's chat) 22:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support per nom, although I'm not opposed to it staying as is for now.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:45, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Support per nom and Yaksar. Pageviews [1] show a very long term overwhelming majority of pageviews. Lennart97 (talk) 08:52, 1 August 2021 (UTC)