Talk:Karen Bruce

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 129.100.255.26 in topic Call for discussion

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karen Bruce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Call for discussion edit

 
Karen Bruce at Canadian Screen Awards Nominee Reception in 2013

I was going to add an image to this article, only to see an anonymous contributor had already removed that image, with the edit summary "I removed the phot as it was if the Canadian film director, karen bruce. Please don't put it up agian." Hmmm. If true, this explanation belonged here, on the talk page. Geo Swan (talk) 18:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

No the edit summary is sufficient since the photo isn't of the correct person. They are two different people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.255.26 (talk) 13:34, 10 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • For the record, 129.100.255.26 was used here by a horrible wikistalker, who is evading their well-deserved indefinite block.

    For the record, my point stands. Explanations that are complicated, or controversial, belong on the talk page, where people know to look for them - not in edit summaries. Geo Swan (talk) 14:55, 9 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • For the record THIS PHOTO ISN'T OF THE SUBJECT OF THIS ARTICLE! No discussion should occur since it would be covered by BLP. If you went and actually looked you would have figured this out. Here let me help you: https://alchetron.com/Karen-Bruce — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.255.26 (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply