Talk:Kanawinka Geopark

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Bahudhara in topic ATTENTION

"Multiple issues" as of November 2015

edit

A "multiple issues" has been placed on the article for several reasons. Firstly, there is a lack of citations. Secondly, the article needs to be re-organised and divided into sections with headings along with an appropriate lead section. Thirdly, the article needs to be updated to reflect the loss of UNESCO recognition (please refer Geopark loses 'global' status, confusion blamed). Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 06:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kanawinka Geopark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sunmist3 (talk) 23:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

ATTENTION

edit

In the box on the right is a link to the Kanawinka Geopark website - it does work, but the website is all about Hervey Bay in Queensland and absolutely nothing about the Kanawinka Geopark. I suggest it be removed as it's irrelevant and misleading.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:101C:8400:8D49:5884:DDAC:1AD8 (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the link from the infobox - the domain name now points to an unrelated travel blog site - although the website retains the Kanawinka Geopark logo, the rest of the content bears no relation to it. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 02:07, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply