Wikipedia

Talk:Kaminey

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Good articleKaminey has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 30, 2013Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
August 27, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
September 24, 2013Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
November 20, 2014Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article
edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What section of the page looks like an advertisement? Anyone who put advert notice would clarify please? And at what point it needs more references? Doesn't it have enough references already? Nadesai (talk) 16:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

No response from last 3 days. Removing the tags. Please discuss before including the tags again.Anshuk (talk) 10:54, 25 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of box office report

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Certain user keeps deleting the boxoffice information from the reception section. I don't understand why. I have put their with citation. To the user, please refrain from doing it. Nadesai (talk) 04:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

The real ending of the movie

edit

I am surprised that nobody at wikipedia got the ending of the movie right. And this is when everybody is claiming that the movie credits its viewers with intelligence! Apparently the movie makes and exception for wikepdians. So much for the fans of the thinking person's director. ;-)

So for those still scratching their heads over the ending of the movie, here is why I think Charlie died at the end. This ending simply makes more sense. like..

(1) The girl Sophiya which we see in the ending as Charlie's girlfriend is the same girl which appears in his dreams in the beginning of the movie. It would be illogical for a character shown as a fictitious dream sequence character to be shown as a real character in the end.

(2) Assuming that Charlie did survive the gunshot, we still have to concede that he was wounded badly enough to become unconscious at the shootout site. It is difficult to imagine how could have he smuggled the diamonds out in such a precarious physical state.

(3) If Charlie was indeed supposed to have stolen the diamonds from the shootout site, the scene about him getting shot is really an unnecessary oddity.

(4) Finally, this is actually a common movie ending style. At least one popular movie, the Taxi Driver has used this fantasy sequence ending. Vishal Bhardwaj choosing this style may be his way of paying homage to Martin Scorsese. In fact Martin Scorsese is much more subtle in his ending of Taxi driver. VB is far more clearer in comparison. Or apparently not, judging by the fact that so many people missed the crucial piece! -—Preceding unsigned comment added by Sisodia (talk • contribs)

Wrong ending of movie

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The page has been edited on 20th June 2010 and the ending has been replaced with wrong sequence. In this new sequence:

  1. Charlie kills Sweety.
  2. Guddu opens a bookie counter in Mikhail's name.

Both these sequences are wrong. In the movie Sweety is very much alive. She and Guddu get married and are parents to twin children. Also it is Charlie who opens bookie counter as it is him who is friend with Mikhail, not Guddu. It is argued that this is last dream of Charlie before dying and does not actually happen. In either case it is certainly not Guddu who opens the counter. I am inclined to revert the page to previous edit if the user who edited does not respond within a month. Onkar (talk) 15:22, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Variety review

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Prashant and FrB.TG, please discuss here about keeping/removing the Variety review before continuing the edit war. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Kaminey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kaminey&oldid=1252165533"