edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kamala Sohonie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Conditions/Stipulations

edit

I've changed some of the stipulations that Raman gave her to more closely align with what's actually described in the linked sources. For example, I cannot find any evidence that one of the conditions was that she "be known throughout the campus after she succeed[ed at] her work". Nor did I find any evidence that working late at night was a condition. If there is some evidence of either of these points, obviously feel free to replace it. Newms34 (talk) 22:24, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Given name throughout the article?

edit

Hello,

is it common and in good style to predominantly use the given name of a woman in English-language Wikipedia articles instead of the surname? Kind of sounds off to me - too familiar, too little objectively distanced and somehow "bloggish". On the other hand, I don't know how cases like this one should be handled where the protagonist is largely mentioned before marrying and thereby changing the surname: Switching from maiden name to married name halfway through the article? Confused ...-- marilyn.hanson (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

First Indian woman to receive a PhD in a scientific discipline?

edit

Article says "who in 1939 became the first Indian woman to receive a PhD in a scientific discipline". This need to qualified further in my opinion as I see other Wikipedia article with Indian woman who received PhD with earlier dates. For example Janaki Ammal is said have obtained a PhD in 1931 from University of Michigan. In case of Kamala Sohonie, rephrasing the above mentioned statement as "who in 1939 became the first Indian woman to receive a PhD in a scientific discipline from an institution in India" would be more accurate. Vinu raj (talk) 02:59, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply