Talk:Kairuku

Merge species

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge species articles to Kairuku, consistent with the usual paleospecies page management. Klbrain (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

---

As noted at Kairuku grebneffi and Kairuku waewaeroa, both of these species articles should be merged into the genus article, as is the usual handling with paleospecies - especially if the material on one species is essentially all there is to say on the genus, and the other species article is of stub size.

(@FunkMonk: I suggest it would be beneficial if you start a merge discussion with a minimal statement in such cases; having to establish the topic may be just that little threshold that keeps people from commenting?) ----Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps, but even in ones where I do start a section, it seems to depend more on the obscurity of the subject than on whether there is a section or not. FunkMonk (talk) 10:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Well, fossil penguins are an acquired taste :p --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Support-That is usually how they do it, plus this is a stub and both of the species articles are start/stub. (Also, there's three species and only two species articles. If there's any, there should be all) Asparagusus (talk) 16:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

comment I don't see any dissension to this idea. I'd say that you could go ahead and merge. Joyous! | Talk 03:26, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

For Kairuku grebneffi,   Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

For Kairuku waewaeroa,   Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 19:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)