Good articleJuha Vainio has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 7, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
March 9, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Translations

edit

Adding translations for Finnish-language song/album names was suggested in the peer review. I'll try to add some, although some of them are pretty problematic to accurately translate. I wrote "Moustached Bachelors" for "Vanhojapoikia viiksekkäitä" -- bachelor is not completely accurate, but I can't find an English term for a male spinster anywhere... "Kotkan poikii ilman siipii" is also difficult since the title is a wordplay where "kotka" can be understood to mean either the town or the animal (eagle). That will probably need to be clarified in the text instead of just translating one way or the other. Jafeluv (talk) 08:17, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Juha Vainio/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:30, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    I am little puzzled by the phrsing of Originally, the nickname belonged to music teacher Arvo Vainio, who had a big nose like a comic book character called Junnu. Later the name was given to another Vainio, Juha.. Were the two related, or is Vainio a common surname? Why did Juha acquire the nickname?  Done
    Changed the last sentence to Later the name was given to Juha because he had the same last name as the teacher. Hopefully that clarifies that the two were not related and that the last name was the reason for Juha acquiring the nickname. Jafeluv (talk) 23:08, 3 March 2011 (UTC)  DoneReply
    The prose does not yet meet the criteria of "reasonably well written". I made a few minor copy-edits, but it could do with a comprehensive copy-edit. The WP:Guild of copyeditors may be able to help.  Done
    Left a request there. Jafeluv (talk) 23:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    OK, much improved. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    I assume good faith for all off-line and Finnish language sources. article appears to be suitably referenced.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Olli Miettinen was nicknamed "the emperor of Fennia", and several different ceremonies were held in his honour. For example, he was crowned in 1958. The motto of the ceremony was "Work for the unemployed, booze for Miettinen". Is this really necessary?  Done
    Probably not; removed. Jafeluv (talk) 23:08, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    What are causeries? Needs explanation.  Done
    Changed to lighthearted column-like text. Is it clearer like that? Jafeluv (talk) 08:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    '' It is said that he made the choice by rolling a die. What was the alternative?  Done
    The alternative was continuing his musical career full-time. I'll try to find a way to make it clear in the text. Jafeluv (talk) 08:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Now clarified, I hope. Jafeluv (talk) 18:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Shortly before quitting teaching, Vainio organized an excursion for the pupils. What was special about this? Why is it mentioned?  Done
    Added "to express his gratitude of the time he had had with them". The point of that sentence is to show that Vainio had enjoyed his time as a teacher, although he never returned to the profession. Jafeluv (talk) 08:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Licensed and captioned
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    On Hold for seven days for a through copy-edit to be performed. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Everything has been addressed, so I am now happy to pass this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 15:11, 9 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Juha Vainio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply