Talk:Josh (novel)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Cover image: edition

edit

In identifying the edition I am going by this bookseller's information. The ISBN is 0207954313. The publisher is variously given as Angus and Robertson, TBS The Book Service Ltd and The Macmillan Company, Australia in various places I have looked, but 1971 1st edition seems definite. Robina Fox (talk) 04:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Good. That's the ISBN listed by the first edition WorldCat record that I have Ext-linked. WorldCat provides some cover images but for Josh only records 40–43 of 44 in chron order![1]
By the way, I revise the caption to "Front cover of unknown edition" whenever the caption doesn't specify, the File page doesn't specify, and I don't readily find image at WorldCat or ISFDB.
I doubt abebooks as a source for ISBN or cover image by edition. Recently I have some exasperating experience about one or the other and I will report which (ISBN or cover image) if I re-stumble upon it. --P64 (talk) 14:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
P.S. I used that linked index of WorldCat records sorted by date as a source for saying that both U.K. and U.S. editions were published within the calendar year. I've done it before and it's time to settle on a formal reference ...   Done --P64 (talk) 14:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Carnegie Medal website review

edit

Revisiting just now (above) I have deleted this paragraph, something I intended to do yesterday.

As the Carnegie Medal winner for 1971, the novel is described on the Carnegie website as being "about overcoming difficulties and staying true to yourself. It's tense and raw with a message for today and an unexpected ending." Josh's situation is said to represent any time or place when people with different backgrounds confront one another.[ref name=medal1971/]

Providing that refname, I noticed that the quotation is from a visitor review ("Your reviews of this book") not from the book or author blurb provided by CILIP. The last sentence does paraphrase CILIP about the book; I expanded the point with quotation in the lead section of the article (yesterday).

I now upgrade this to Start, twice, which may justify deleting material from a contributor review --justifies to myself at least! --P64 (talk) 14:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Josh (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply