Talk:Murder of Joseph Rafferty
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Troubles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article is written in Hiberno-English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delete?
edit"The article subject is not notable and the entire article is non-sourced and contains controversial and unsubstantiated accusations against individuals or groups."
While I would question "not notable", I note that it is sourced in the external links. I'm sure there are areas that can be improved so I would welcome help rather than deletion. Fergananim (talk) 00:45, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- The first or second sentence in the Article should say explicitly why the person is notable. And anything and everything in the Article must be properly sourced. And accusations against groups, especially accusations about murder, must have several reliable sources. Sources that contain just opinions and speculation should not be used whatsoever. The controversial nature of the Article, its lack of proper sourcing, and the external links to sources containing entirely, or mostly, speculation require that this article either be completely rewritten or just deleted. The article does not appear to be an article about "Joseph Rafferty", but an article about speculation that this individual may have been murdered by people with an association with Sinn Féin or the Provisional Irish Republican Army. Such accusations should not be included in Wikipedia unless they can be completely backed up. Just my humble opinion, take it for what its worth. King of Nothing (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- So in that case would it be more appropriate to title it "Murder of Joseph Rafferty"? Fergananim (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- That would solve my problem with "The article does not appear to be an article about "Joseph Rafferty", but an article about speculation that this individual may have been murdered by people with an association with Sinn Féin or the Provisional Irish Republican Army." King of Nothing (talk) 01:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Removed my request for this article to be deleted, as the issues of my concern are being worked on. King of Nothing (talk) 05:54, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- That would solve my problem with "The article does not appear to be an article about "Joseph Rafferty", but an article about speculation that this individual may have been murdered by people with an association with Sinn Féin or the Provisional Irish Republican Army." King of Nothing (talk) 01:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- So in that case would it be more appropriate to title it "Murder of Joseph Rafferty"? Fergananim (talk) 01:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)