 | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. It was contested by Cyclopia (talk · contribs) on 2010-02-27 with the comment: Article is sourced and notability is a possibility, given the sources and the type of coverage. Bring to AfD if needed. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
editOK, there are a lot of strange things going on with this page.
For a start, some of the links are either broken or seem unrelated. There are a lot of claims which have not been proven.
Who are the Invincible Group? Why is there no company of that name registered at Companies House? Why is there so little outside publicity of the claims of awards and other achievements by this company?
Joetheurbanspaceman (talk) 11:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Looks like he wrote this entirely uncritical entry himself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.167.47.55 (talk) 16:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
This page is absolutely ridiculous. The funniest part is - we all know that "Jordan Kensington" is EXACTLY the sort of image-obsessed creep who would write/get someone else to edit this entry. The $17 million figure is unquestionably complete rubbish, and part of the illusion that 'Kensington' tries to project.
$17 MILLION personal wealth? That is literally a joke, at least he could have humoured us by making the figure remotely realistic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.92.116.185 (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Jordan Kensington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080420091840/http://www.makeyourmark.org.uk:80/inspiring_stories/jordan_kensington to http://www.makeyourmark.org.uk/inspiring_stories/jordan_kensington
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Jordan Kensington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140518174546/http://www.gomonews.com/british-technology-firm-zuricom-announces-launch-of-new-dual-sim-smartphone/ to http://www.gomonews.com/british-technology-firm-zuricom-announces-launch-of-new-dual-sim-smartphone/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330183021/http://www.chelseamonthly.com/2011/08/london-entrepreneurs-are-at-the-forefront-of-global-innovation/ to http://www.chelseamonthly.com/2011/08/london-entrepreneurs-are-at-the-forefront-of-global-innovation/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090407004801/http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0%2C%2C10268~1611249%2C00.html to http://www.chelseafc.com/page/LatestNews/0%2C%2C10268~1611249%2C00.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130014122/http://www.britishmusicweek.com/ to http://www.britishmusicweek.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517224931/http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20080312/ent/ent3.html to http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20080312/ent/ent3.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
External links
edit- There are nine entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
- ELpoints #3) states:
Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
- LINKFARM states:
There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
- WP:ELMIN:
Minimize the number of links
. - WP:ELCITE:
access dates are not appropriate in the external links section. Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.
-- Otr500 (talk) 04:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)