Talk:Jon Wefald

Comment on Removed Info

I saw the ANI discussion about this removal of material, so I came to take a look. My review of the sources is that, this is definitely WP:UNDUE, as this is all information about Prince and Krause, not about Wefald. I do think that we need to add one more sentence back, along with the citation in which Prince counter-claims that Wefald did know. Given that he went as far as to file a lawsuit to that issue, it's important enough to Wefald's career that it can/should be included. Once that lawsuit is finally resolved and reported on, we should again adjust the article to reflect the final decision (or negotiated settlement, as the case may be). I'm going to Be bold and add that sentence in; please let me know if you think it's still stepping across the bounds of what is acceptable. Also, to Spacini: It's possible that some of this info, properly written, belongs on the Ron Prince article (which I haven't looked at yet). These sources seem to be reliable, although we have to be careful to note that each of these claims are nothing more than that--claims made on a lawsuit that hasn't yet been resolved. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

• Sorry, I was away from the computer for quite awhile. I have no real problem with how it stands now. It's just that the case was taking up more than half of his bio before. And once I was accused of whitewashing it, I knew I needed to take it to a higher level. Thanks for your work. Lithistman (talk) 04:42, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

I totally agree with bringing it to ANI, and you were totally right to strip everything out--to me, at least, WP:BLP means we should always err on the side of keeping things out until we can be assured the info is verified and not undue. I'll keep the article watchlisted, as often claims of "whitewashing" have a tendency to not die down quickly. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually, from the comments left at ANI, it seems I should have taken it to the BLPN board. Either way, though, the outcome is good, and I appreciate having an extra set of eyes on this article. Lithistman (talk) 05:03, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jon Wefald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080329131430/http://www.rosholt.org/des-jt.html to http://www.rosholt.org/des-jt.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100623003122/http://www.k-state.edu/media/newsreleases/may08/wefald51208.html to http://www.k-state.edu/media/newsreleases/may08/wefald51208.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101008094920/http://hostfest.com/halloffame/view.asp?ID=67 to http://hostfest.com/halloffame/view.asp?ID=67

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jon Wefald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516053152/http://www.k-state.edu/media/achievements/scholarstop10of5pub.pdf to http://www.k-state.edu/media/achievements/scholarstop10of5pub.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)