Talk:John Woodcock, Baron Walney

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Woodcock (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120401141058/http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/meet_labour_s_man_set_to_replace_john_hutton_1_570895?referrerPath=news to http://www.nwemail.co.uk/news/meet_labour_s_man_set_to_replace_john_hutton_1_570895?referrerPath=news

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Sexual harassment accusation and resignation from the Labour Party

The page currently says "Woodcock stated that he would take the General Secretary of the Labour Party to court to force an independent inquiry to take place.". Is there any further information available about if this independent inquiry into the allegations of sexual harassment ever took place? 83.218.151.178 (talk) 13:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Anything yet?83.218.151.178 (talk) 10:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

I suspect that now he has stepped down as an MP he is not pursuing this. John Womble (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:44, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

I assume one would have been done before he was appointed as a special envoy but I can't find anything about it. Can anyone with stronger Google skills find anything? 80.47.148.59 (talk) 14:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

I have added an update based on something he tweeted when he was ennobled. Busypenguin (talk) 16:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Any update on Woodock having an independent inquiry about the allegations of sexual harassment yet? Been a few years now 92.28.73.211 (talk) 00:50, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Still no update? 92.7.26.190 (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Any update yet? 89.243.195.186 (talk) 14:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Paid positions as a lobbyist for arms and fossil fuel industry groups

What is wrong with the following information about Woodcock?

He holds a number of paid positions as a lobbyist for arms and fossil fuel industry groups. These include paid chair of the Purpose Defence Coalition, members of which include arms manufacturer Leonardo, which has "extensive links" to Israel’s military, paid adviser to lobbying company Rud Pedersen, which has oil and gas company Glencore as a client and paid adviser to the Purpose Business Coalition, which includes BP as a member.

It was recently removed from the bio.

Burrobert (talk) 06:11, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

It is against House of Lords rules to be a paid lobbyist. You can’t make allegations in Wikipedia bios, hence its deletion. Busypenguin (talk) 11:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

You can't just remove sourced content for no apparent reason. AusLondonder (talk) 14:52, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok fine - I will rephrase it as the current wording does not even reflect the article. There is a big difference between holding advisory roles with companies that do lobbying and that individual being a lobbyist. It might sound like splitting hairs but it’s the difference between someone breaking Lords standards and someone not.

I would welcome discussion on the “extensive links to Israel”. Is that not a partisan insertion into a bio? Busypenguin (talk) 15:00, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

" 'extensive links' to Israel’s military" is about the defence company Leonardo. It is in the Byline Times source. A google search also shows that it is a reasonable assessment. Burrobert (talk) 10:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

References