Conflict of interest, notability and potential copyright violation issues? edit

This is one of several dozen articles created by this person’s agent. (It was not necessarily done with their knowledge.) It should be reviewed for notability, conflict of interest and neutral language. Some of the agent’s other articles had copyright issues as well. For more details, see:

A. B. (talkcontribs) 18:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing, etc edit

In a similar way to other articles from the same spammer (see section above), this one made a number of claims for which no evidence was adduced but also claims to which footnotes were attached -- footnotes linking to pages that did not back up the claims. There was also a whole paragraph lifted from a PR release by an advertising company.

I've made a number of changes that I think have taken the article from "poor and dishonest" to "poor but honest": see this diff and its successors.

If Clang's work is significant then surely some disinterested person can edit an article on him honestly, without puffery or flimflam. -- Hoary (talk) 01:11, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on John Clang. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:51, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply