Talk:Jewish tartan

Did you know

@User:Longhornsg This might also be a fun article to nominate for DYK. It needs a photo though. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 13:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Great idea to nominate. Need to do before 24 September. A photo would be nice, but not mandatory. Longhornsg (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Nominating today. I'd like to add a photo, but I can't find any in the public domain. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 17:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 01:36, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Jewish tartans, also called Kosher tartans, are tartans made for the Jewish community of Scotland? Source: https://www.tartanregister.gov.uk/tartanDetails?ref=5637
  • ALT1: ... that there are Jewish tartans made for the Jewish community of Scotland? Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/01/world/europe/kosher-kilts-and-plaid-skullcaps-scotlands-jews-get-a-tartan.html
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: I would have liked to add a photo, but I couldn't find any in the public domain.

Created by Bohemian Baltimore (talk) and Longhornsg (talk). Nominated by Bohemian Baltimore (talk) at 17:07, 23 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Jewish tartans; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article passes Earwig and is sourced. I prefer ALT1 over ALT0. CJ-Moki (talk) 01:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

• @Bohemian Baltimore, CJ-Moki, and Vaticidalprophet: I've pulled this article on account of the close paraphrasing that was left unaddressed at the post-promotion discussion. Hopefully, that can be fixed here :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 21:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

  @theleekycauldron ALT2 is perfectly acceptable with me. I'd be good with using that hook. Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 23:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

  @Bohemian Baltimore: happy to hear it, any chance we could clean up the close paraphrasing? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

• @Bohemian Baltimore: Has the above paraphrasing concern been addressed? Z1720 (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

• @Bohemian Baltimore: has been editing Wikipedia but did not respond to the above ping. Unless they, @Longhornsg:, or someone else takes over this nomination, this is liable to be closed as declined. Z1720 (talk) 17:25, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

• @User:Z1720 Thanks for the reminder, this had slipped my mind. How does the article look now? Bohemian Baltimore (talk) 01:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

• @CJ-Moki: As the original reviewer, can you check to see if the close-paraphrasing concerns have been resolved? Z1720 (talk) 15:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

• @Z1720: If this is accurate and I'm reading it correctly, it appears that the close paraphrasing issue has been resolved. CJ-Moki (talk) 17:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

• @CJ-Moki: If there are no other concerns, can you readd the green tick below? If you have any concerns, can you note them below? Z1720 (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

• @Z1720: Approved I do not have any other concerns at present. CJ-Moki (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

• Adding tick per above. Z1720 (talk) 22:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)