Talk:Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PigeonChickenFish in topic Notability
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 June 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Buidhe (talk · contribs) on 9 September 2020. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jessica Kingsley Publishers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notability edit
This publisher has questionable notability as a topic for a stand-alone article.
It was created by an SPA during their brief presence in 2006, and I don't see the topic as passing the WP:GNG, or the specific guideline for companies and organizations. This should probably be deleted. Mathglot (talk) 21:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- I am not familiar with the concept of something losing notability here. If the article once passed notability, shouldn't that hold value and precedence? How does one loose notability? PigeonChickenFish (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC)