Talk:Jeff Stein (author)

Latest comment: 6 months ago by 2600:4040:44ED:8100:5D31:85C7:31A7:8402 in topic Question about maintenance tags

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jeff Stein (author). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Question about maintenance tags edit

I do not understand the damaging assessment at the top of my entry ("Jeff Stein_author") saying "The neutrality of this article is disputed." I see no notes or edits challenging the accuracy or neutrality of the biographical material. Or you judging the "neutrality" of the cited works? Is that a requirement? All the cited pieces were rigorously fact-checked prior to publication and none have faced demands for retraction. I see only two updated links by an editor here. Please explain and/or delete this assessment. Thank you. Spytalker (talk) 21:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Frankly, the fact that the page appears to have been edited by its subject is reason alone to dispute its neutrality. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for responding. But again, I'm perplexed by your actions. I edited the biography to correct errors. And I ask, what are you looking for in terms of "neutrality" here? That seems highly subjective to me. Your comment implies that the facts of my biography are too positive. Who are you to make that judgment? What's your expertise? How would you change it? How can we moved beyond this? 2600:4040:44ED:8100:5D31:85C7:31A7:8402 (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply