Talk:Jean Kekedo

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:15, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Jean Kekedo and Rose Kekedo created by Roundtheworld (talk), Mary Kekedo created by Dumelow (talk). Nominated by Roundtheworld at 16:57, 12 October 2021 (UTC).Reply

  • Hi Roundtheworld, I was intrigued by Mary and managed to find a source that gave enough biographical information to create an article on her. I've bolded it here as a potential double hook, if you've no objection? If so, I'll have to rustle up a QPQ review for it, as I am not exempt. If you'd rather Jean run alone that's no problem either, just let me know and I'll nominate separately - Dumelow (talk) 19:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi Dumelow (talk). Delighted to have you on board. I only wrote Rose Kekedo two days ago, so I suppose it is a triple hook? Great that you found that info on Mary although when I follow the link to your main source I get asked for a password. You might like to add Mary to Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/210. Best. Roundtheworld (talk) 19:55, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Roundtheworld, will be great to run the triple. The source is a newspaper article (printing a book extract) hosted by the EBSCO Information Services, access can be gained by applying for a free account at Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library. I've completed a QPQ for my article at Template:Did you know nominations/The Young Woman of Amajac. Mandarax, excuse the ping but you know more about the DYK templates than anyone I know! Would you be able to sort out the credit templates for this nomination? I am not certain what needs adding to integrate the two additional articles? Many thanks in advance - Dumelow (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Awww, thanks. I've patched the other two articles into the nomination. Jean and Rose are credited to Roundtheworld and Mary is credited to Dumelow. Lemme know if any other credits should be included. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 07:30, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Mandarax, looks grand to me - Dumelow (talk) 07:46, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Roundtheworld (talk) 08:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Review in progress. Early point - not all the articles mention all the rest of them. I think Mary's second name was Angela and her husband was called Walter. ... and there is a poor picture here of Mary which can be used under fair use. Victuallers (talk) 13:30, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. Have checked the three articles and there are wikilinks to the other two Dames in all three. Roundtheworld (talk) 07:08, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I did notice them. Its a minor point anyway. If you people can bear with me, I am busy , but hope to complete the review in next 30 hours - interesting women. Victuallers (talk) 13:01, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Jean Kekedo's article is more than long enough, its well referenced to good sources, it is neutral and shows no sign of close paraphrasing. There is no image of Jean that is freely licenced. The shared hook is interesting as it describes the honoured women of one family. In the final section of this article the three honours are referenced that are the key to the main hook.
  • The Mary Kekedo article is new enough and long enough, its well referenced to good sources, it is neutral and shows no sign of close paraphrasing. There is an image of Mary that I added as fair use. The shared hook is interesting and about one family's honoured women. Victuallers (talk) 21:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Rose Kekedo's article is also new and long enough, its referenced to good sources, its neutral and shows no sign of close paraphrasing. There is an image of Rose that I reloaded under fair use. This is a fine collaboration between principally two editors as part of the women in red editathon focussing on women from Oceania.
  In summary good to go. Victuallers (talk) 08:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)Reply