Talk:Jason Witt

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Skarmory in topic Requested move 5 February 2022

Requested move 6 June 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved, DAB created at Jason Witt. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


Jason Witt (fighter)Jason Witt – Redirect already leads to this pageHeinzMaster (talk) 02:00, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

*Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 21:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC) Oppose, support DAB at base name as per Necrothesp.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Requested move 5 February 2022 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. I will also note that the runner is currently up at AfD. (closed by non-admin page mover) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 22:26, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


Jason Witt (fighter)Jason Witt – This request was made in June 2021 and most supported the move. There are only two Jason Witts. The runner gets 0 views a day while the fighter gets 137 views a day. A hatnote on the fighter article leading to the runner would reduce the needed clicks to get readers to their intended article. Marty2Hotty (talk) 21:46, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Support as per nom. 162 etc. (talk) 22:22, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Support The argument against this move during the last discussion was the existence of the runner's article. Now that we can see the overwhelming discrepancy in page views and usage, there appears to be a primary topic.--Yaksar (let's chat) 20:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.