Talk:Jangle pop
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Michaeljm1964 in topic History Section Biased?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jangle pop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
History Section Biased? edit
The History section seems to be focused on New Zealand and American acts, many of whom are very obscure. Perhaps this section needs to be re-written to include both acts from equally influential countries (UK, Canada, etc.) and more mainstream acts? Michaeljm1964 (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)