Talk:Jane Eisner

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Coretheapple in topic Merged
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jane Eisner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Offline 11:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Article issues

edit

COI tag added as article created by SPI paid editor or subject. Article remains thin and seems to be borderline notabiltiy. Sourcing is largely related to the subject, there are unverified claims, and one entire section of puffery was sourced to a Wall Street Journal article that did not substantiate the claimed affiliation. Sourcing of entire article requires examination per BLP. Coretheapple (talk) 14:23 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Merged

edit

I've WP:BOLDly merged with The Forward. This article began as a WP:DUCK self-written or paid editing COPVIO, lifted in toto from http://forward.com/author/jane-eisner/. Much of the self-promotion and puffery dropped out over the years, but it remains essentially a resume, sourced mainly to related entities, where there is sourcing at all. The only independent sourcing to speak of is a brief New York Times announcement of her appointment and a personal article on her daily routine, which together I think don't meet GNG. I noticed sourcing not supporting statements in the article, including a list of presumed credits sourced to a Wall Street Journal article that mentioned only one of them. Overall I think merger is the best solution. Coretheapple (talk) 16:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply