Talk:James Rosen (journalist)

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Freedom of speech High‑importance

	Freedom of speech portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why no talk on the "talk" page? edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I see that the entire talk page has been essentially removed and banked in the archives. Certainly this page must be approached with extreme care considering the current controversy surrounding this individual and, the US DOJ. However....I see no reason to simply end all discussion of the content of the article. If other editors are concerned with vandalism, or individuals injecting POV into the article, why not lock it, or make it semi-protected?

I just don't see a reason to persistently archive the entirety of a talk page, as soon as it's written solely because of a currently heated political climate. In fact, that seems to me to be the point of a talk page in the first place.....

If others following this article disagree with me I would greatly appreciate hearing your input. :)

24.60.214.65 (talk) 04:05, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

The section of talk which has been repeatedly removed was not archived. There are not yet any archives for this talk page. It was removed because it is irrelevant to this article. JRSpriggs (talk) 12:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Once anything is on the talk page, it is nobodys business to remove it, unless its libelous, slanderous, or exhibits anything of an offensive nature. Relevance is a matter of opinion. Marc S. 206.192.35.125 (talk) 18:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Rosen (journalist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110219100931/http://www.observer.com/2008/watergate-revisionism-fox-journalist-expiates-john-mitchell to http://www.observer.com/2008/watergate-revisionism-fox-journalist-expiates-john-mitchell

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic