Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Freedom of speech page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | Freedom of speech Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | WikiProject Freedom of speech was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 7 August 2013. |
Importance rating of Julian Assange in Freedom of Speech edit
At Talk:Julian_Assange#Wikiproject_interest I argue the rating should be high in Freedom of speech and mid in Human rights. Currently set to low in both. If anyone would like to assess these ratings please do. NadVolum (talk)
Twitter has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Tax protester constitutional arguments edit
Tax protester constitutional arguments has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Rahul Ligma edit
An article which may be of interest to members of this project—Rahul Ligma—has been proposed for merging with Acquisition of Twitter by Elon Musk. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. ––FormalDude (talk) 00:44, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Jamie Kalven FAC edit
I have nominated Jamie Kalven, an American journalist based in Chicago, for Featured Article status. Your feedback is welcome at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jamie Kalven/archive1. Cheers! Edge3 (talk) 02:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for McCarthyism edit
McCarthyism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:08, 26 December 2023 (UTC)