Talk:Jaduguda uranium mine

DYK review

• Sorry but this article has not been 5x expanded and includes material copied straight from the refs. It had 617B prose text before expansion began on 20 March, it now has 1570B, which leaves it about 1500 characters short. Bad grammar throughout but I'll give it a copyedit. The Geology section is lifted straight from the source, and I haven't even checked any of the other refs yet. Simon Burchell (talk) 19:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

• I've checked a second cite against the Uranium purification plant section, and it is also lifted straight from the ref, which doesn't give me much hope for the rest - the only reason I think the whole article isn't a 100% match against sources is because I copyedited the bad grammar (also present in the sources). Unfortunately I think the whole article needs to be checked against every ref; if my suspicions are confirmed then the whole thing needs to be either re-written or deleted. Simon Burchell (talk) 16:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Jaduguda Uranium Mine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100726131835/http://www.ucil.gov.in:80/web/mines.html to http://www.ucil.gov.in/web/mines.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080616061316/http://www.frontlineonnet.com:80/fl1618/16180700.htm to http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl1618/16180700.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110714193847/http://www.ucil.gov.in:80/web/index.asp to http://www.ucil.gov.in/web/index.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110714193847/http://www.ucil.gov.in:80/web/index.asp to http://www.ucil.gov.in/web/index.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Expert needed

Article currently reads in part

When uranium ore is extracted from the ground, 99.28% of the mined ore is treated as waste as the uranium isotopes used in nuclear power plants mainly is uranium-235 leaving behind the major portion of the ore which consists of uranium-236 and uranium-238 as well as some other components. This waste (also referred to as tailings) is then neutralised with lime and carried through pipelines to a tailing pond.

This contains some true statements but also utter rubbish. The mine and its associated works do not separate the isotopes of Uranium. Mine tailings do not contain depleted Uranium. Andrewa (talk) 17:57, 10 May 2021 (UTC)