Talk:Jade Jagger

Latest comment: 5 years ago by GRuban in topic Suggested edit
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jade Jagger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jade Jagger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Suggested edit

edit

Given that none of the sources for this entry call Jade Jagger a "socialite", I think it should be removed. The discussion here explains the issue more broadly. I'd like to add that it is entirely possible to go out and dig up sources which call her a socialite, and I think it would be rather a bit WP:POINTy if someone were to do that for no good reason!

I would simply make the edit myself, but I have a COI here as Jade is a neighbor.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 13:20, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reading the sources, they do call her a "lifestyle icon". "boho lifestyle queen -- an image on which she's built not just a brand but an empire"; "'I think a lot of people look to me as a sort of lifestyle icon,' says Jade Jagger in the West End office where she is plotting what could be a very lucrative new commercial venture, 'Someone who has made their lifestyle as something that's important to them - the way I live, the way everything aesthetically is.'". Would that be a satisfactory substitute? --GRuban (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I think so, yes.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Done Also it looks like she also designs homes, not just jewelry, so added a sentence on that. Have to say the article could use more work - surely designing one dagger-or-ice-pick didn't "revive her career" - but that will have to be done later. --GRuban (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply