Talk:Jacob S. Coxey Sr.

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

...and he lost edit

Jeez... this guy's life was a series of failures... :( KI 17:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Legal Tender? edit

the last sentence on this page does not seem right...could someone see if it is vandalism? please correct

Jacob Coxey's son was named Legal Tender. This is not a mistake.

his sons name is truly Legal Tender?!?! wow... then how is he J.S. Coxey Sr.??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.37.7.25 (talk) 02:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Article Cleanup edit

This article is clearly lacking in quality. There are no sections or subsections to this article, and the Infobox is largly incomplete. Also, there seems to be no paragraphing in this article.

The article's also confusing. The first paragraph calls him a socialist, while the last one calls him a capitalist. Which is it???

His son is called Legal Tender because he supported printing money to support public works projects, hardly a capitalist stance in the 19th century. More like a free silver populist.Pustelnik (talk) 02:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacob S. Coxey Sr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply