Talk:Jackie Forster

"Personal Knowledge" edits by 172.186.127.72

Hi 172.186.127.72. I've heavily edited your edits to Jackie Forster, because you didn't provide any citation for them. "Personal knowledge" is not an acceptable citation. (See Citing sources, No original research, Verifiability, and Verifiability for why this is so.)

Is there any source that might be available that would back up your personal knowledge? Yonmei 03:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Sappho

While I agree that the Sappho publication is an important part of Lesbian history I disagree with the statement 'the UK's longest-running lesbian publication'. Diva has been running for much longer and Arena Three was also published for 9 years....So Added Sappho as being 'one of' the longest running...

Fluffball70 23:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Introduction

I have just learned about Jackie Forster today, thanks to Google (!) It's a good and informative article, but I wonder why her husband takes up such a prominent place in the article - right up front as though this marriage defined her, though it lasted only four years. I would rather see more content about her and his prominence a bit farther down. Sorry if this is in any way a misuse of this talk page - I only just got on Wikipedia today, so I'm not sure how to do it! Cskfeminist (talk) 07:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

You're not misusing the talk page as long as you're offering constructive criticism of the article. As far as I can see, after several edits in the interim, her husband is now mentioned twice: in one sentence in the body of the article and also in the infobox. Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 03:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jackie Forster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312072844/http://www.knittingcircle.org.uk/jackieforster.html to http://www.knittingcircle.org.uk/jackieforster.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070513153354/http://www.womenslibrary.org.uk/laic/laic.html to http://www.womenslibrary.org.uk/laic/laic.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070306035142/http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/guide/talent/m/mackenzie_jacqueline.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/guide/talent/m/mackenzie_jacqueline.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:20, 19 November 2017 (UTC)