Talk:JDSU

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 142.52.88.205 in topic Acterna

JDS Uniphase edit

the company is really called JDS Uniphase yeah. Perhaps someone can update the article to include this. A merger of JDS and Uniphase I believe is the reason for its name, please check. --x1987x 23:38, 8 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

nevermind, it is the other way, JDSU, well anyways someone needs to standardize the name throughout the article. --x1987x 23:41, 8 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

The company is techically JDS Uniphase. The company recently recently adopted JDSU as it's brand name, reflecting common use and the stock symbol.

JDSU is the result of a merger of JDS Fitel and Uniphase Corporations. It should be noted that the 'S' in JDS also includes Josef Stauss, a founder and CEO for many years. Equal credit should be given to Kevin Kalkoven. Kevin was CEO of Uniphase at the time of the merger and remained as CEO and Co-Chairman after the merger. Kevin was instrumental in building the Uniphase portion of the company from the original Uniphase corporation, a relatively small San Jose manufacturer of gas and semiconductor lasers. Uniphase grew through aquisitions of United Technologies Photonics (UTP)located in Bloomfield, Connecticut and Philips Optical Components located in Eindhover, Netherlands;

It should also be noted that JDS Fitel had acquired Optical Coating Laboratories Inc. (OCLI) just before the merger. OCLI remains a signifant part of the corporating and include the Flex division. Flex is a manufacturer of specialty pigments used in security labels and international currencies.

After the merger JDS Uniphase acquired signigicant optical component developers including Epitaxx, a New Jersey developer of photodiodes; E-tek, a San Jose developer of passive and active optical components with operations in Shenzhen, China; and SDLI, a leading developer of semiconductor diode lasers. The E-tek and SDLI acuqistions ranked among the largest corporate acquistions in history at that time with valuations of $16 billion and $40 Billion.

Today, many of the acquistions have been consolidated into the San Jose and Shenzhen, China Operations. The company utilizes significant manufacturing capability of contract manufacturers in Thailand and Malaysia. The origninal San Jose, Ottawa, Santa Rosa and Connecticut operations continue as primary product development centers. Additional Product development centers are located throughout the United States including Ewing, NJ and Melbourne, FL.

The recent acquisitions of Acterna and Agility greatly increase the depth and breadth of JDSU's product lines in the areas of Optical Test Equipment and tunable transponders. The acquisitons present significant growth opportunities for the new JDSU. JDSU contines to be the leader in optical component and systems markets.

how can the article completely leave out JDS was originally a Canadian company ? edit

a 9 billion dollar merger between JDS fitel of Canada and Uniphase of the US is how it was formed. that's horrible how you don't even mention that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grmike (talkcontribs) 22:20, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

PR blurb masquarading as an article edit

Most of this article is almost directly from their website... http://www.jdsu.com/company/mergers-and-acquisitions.html

Sorry, but it's just spam...

14:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC) MA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.12.172.5 (talk)

I disagree, it's part of the history of the company, which has been one of the most acquisitive of its time. A mass deletion like this seems like vandalism. Perhaps there is a more consise way to present this info? --Opticalgirl (talk) 13:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Acterna edit

There is not any mention of Acterna. I think a dedicated section explaining it would be necessary. I came across this name (acterna) during my recent telecom work and I did not have any idea what it was, and Wikipedia did not have anything related to it. For these new to the market, like me, we need to know what acterna means. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.52.88.205 (talk) 22:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply